Salemhigh.net


Salemhigh.net is a forum for the free exchange of information concerning Salem High School, and for topics concerning public education in general. Salemhigh.net has no official relationship with Salem High School in Salem, Massachusetts, and the views expressed here represent the views of individual posters. No views expressed here should be considered "official" views of Salemhigh.net. Salemhigh.net is an unmoderated forum; however, people are encouraged to send email to admin@salemhigh.net if they feel any information here is inaccurate, or if they would like to see information added.

Here is a list of SOME of the events making salemhigh.net necessary:


Notes

1 I don't know all of the details on the drug assembly yet, but when I have the details, I'll comment more on it.

In the meantime... let me throw this out there for discussion. Why are we more worried about Oxycontin and Heroin, "self" medicating drugs that affect a statistically tiny percentage of the population, while at the same time we continue to turn blind eyes to the number of children who are medicated (mostly involuntarily) with Ritalin and Prozac? It's amazing to me to see the statistics of kids these days diagnosed with ADHD and depression, kids who are taught, often at a very young age, that there is a pharmaceutical solution to any problem.

Kids get indoctrinated early to believe:

You're too fat? Take a pill. You can't sit still? Take a pill. You're not happy? Take a pill.

Is it any wonder that "illegal" pills hold great attraction, after kids grow up in an environment where it seems that half the population is doped up on one thing or another?

Here's another sad and often ignored fact: recovering drug addicts are not heroes, and they should not be treated as such. They should be helped. They should be encouraged to get themselves clean. They should be loved by their families. They should NOT be paraded through the news.

Putting Jeff Allison all over the news for anything other than throwing fastballs is misguided. Parading Joel Levine across High School stages is also, in my mind, misguided. Doing so attaches celebrity to what is, at the end of the day, a behavior that should be viewed as disgraceful, a behavior that should carry with it a certain degree of shame. Becoming addicted to recreational drugs is... make no mistake... a dumb thing to do. If anything, we should be giving press coverage to the kids who are smart enough to NOT become addicted to drugs. If you want to have a "drug assembly," put a successful, well-respected celebrity up on stage who can look the audience in the eye and say, "hiya, folks. I'd love to talk to you about being addicted to drugs, but I was never dumb enough to BECOME addicted to drugs. Don't be dumb; be like me."

Kids need to know that it is far better never to become involved with drugs, than it is to recover from drug addiction. In a sick way, it seems like the press is glamorizing drug use by giving so much face time to recovering drug addicts. If I were a kid feeling a little lonely or a little attention-starved, being a recovering drug addict might seem like a pretty good gig with its packed auditoriums, interviews, smiles, and clapping people. That's a pretty dangerous road to take.

Top of page

2 From the Salem Evening News 1/6/05

Letter: New leadership needed at Salem H.S.

To the Editor:

Again, I am writing to strongly and sincerely condemn the cold, callous and insensitive manner in which we again lost one of the best coaches on the North Shore ' Beth Kapnis Livermore.

Is this a nightmare witch hunt to put cronies and hacks of the controversial principal whose legendary lack of people skills and leadership required her to take a taxpayer-funded course to improve her flawed image? Last year, she led the charge to get rid of one of the most best area boys basketball coaches, Wayne Hanscom. Again, the players and fans are the losers in this shabby and unprofessional leadership. She leaves ashes wherever she goes.

I have watched Beth in high school, college, and coaching her hometown team. She is a member of a popular Salem family whose name is synonymous with excellence and sportsmanship.

As a parent of three sons and as an elementary school basketball coach for 32 years, I deplore the leadership that made this decision. Beth has all the right stuff to help continue the dynasty of girls basketball here. She is a true role model and young profile in courage who personifies Salem pride.

Soon, I believe, there will be a lawsuit over this action. No one should be allowed to be treated so coldly and callously. A clear set of injustices were done and justice needs to be served.

In 1994, after a bitter strike of the teachers, I called for a healing process as a member of the School Committee. I asked for amnesty for all coaches and leaders in the strike. Unfortunately, my call for healing was disregarded.

The former superintendent fired all the football coaches and none are allowed to coach again in Salem. We lost some of the best and brightest coaches then, due to blind arrogance and stupidity.

Now, 10 years later, we see another cycle and purge. This cannot continue for Salem's sake. We deserve better for our student-athletes. It is beyond my imagination why leaders like superintendents, high school principals and athletic directors make such pompous and pathetic decisions. No one would like to be treated like Beth and Wayne have been.

A member of the School Committee called for a report by the superintendent over coaching hirings and firings. This is like asking the car insurance business if we need a rate hike. Does anyone in their right mind expect an honest report of wrongdoing and misjudgment?

I sincerely hope and pray the new superintendent does not copy the poor judgment of his boss in hiring coaches and principals.

Salem has a legendary tradition of strength and success in sports. This is a sad affair and I strongly believe the leaders of this debacle need to resign and retire. Now is a time to heal from the strife and turmoil at the high school and for new leadership with vision, vitality, compassion, and concern and commitment to excellence.

We must make Salem once again the flagship city of sports and academics based on pride, excellence and sportsmanship on and off the court.

Thomas H. Furey - Councilor at large - Salem

Top of page

Mass.principal prevents paper from publishing articles critical of her policies

Even after students complied with her request to change the articles, she is still preventing publication

' 2003 Student Press Law Center

December 10, 2003

MASSACHUSETTS ' After refusing to publish the student newspaper until changes were made to three articles critical of her policies, the principal of Salem High School is still declining to run the issue.

The three articles, which were planned for the front page, address the school's new bans on wearing hats and eating in class as well as the lowered morale of the students.

Members of the student newspaper, the Witches Brew, said in the Tuesday edition of The Salem News that they reluctantly agreed to the changes requested by Principal Ann Papagiotas. The students said Papagiotas inserted explanations for the new policies, writing in one article that food was banned from classrooms because of a mouse problem.

Nevertheless, the newspaper still has not been published despite protest from students on the staff.

'[The Witches Brew is] the student view,' co-editor Todd Graham told the Salem News. 'It's our voice, and this is what the paper is meant to be.'

Neither Papagiotas nor Superintendent Herb Levine could be reached for comment.

However, in The Salem News article, Levine defended the principal's decision.

'The school newspaper is strictly and only in the authority of the school principal,' Levine said. 'I believe that she's not only doing the right thing, but she's doing it the right way.'

Levine said Papagiotas is not allowing the newspaper to publish because some of the opinions in the articles could be qualified as 'disruption or disorder' that might spark arguments and fights.

In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that public school authorities are only allowed to regulate student expression that materially disrupts the school environment. School authorities cannot base a regulation on the fear of disturbance.

However, in the 1988 Supreme Court ruling in Hazelwood School District v. Kulhmeier, the court said a school is permitted editorial control over the content of a school-sponsored newspaper if school officials can show that it is 'reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.'

But in 1988, the Massachusetts Legislature enacted the Massachusetts Student Free Expression Law to provide public high schools in the state with protection against censorship at school, thus undoing the impact the of Hazelwood decision.

Top of page